tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post4605731659257422644..comments2024-01-14T00:48:22.175-08:00Comments on BAALS-2-the-WAALS: Rules Lawyering from my PerspectiveKevinmcd28http://www.blogger.com/profile/06915604908609700895noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-2133695877834878962011-12-19T10:35:22.032-08:002011-12-19T10:35:22.032-08:00I am not the Dan you are looking for :)I am not the Dan you are looking for :)Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04179305108630227191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-50822631477317690472011-12-18T21:03:21.360-08:002011-12-18T21:03:21.360-08:00thanks quaade, ill fix my play and the friends of ...thanks quaade, ill fix my play and the friends of mine I know play like this tooKevinmcd28https://www.blogger.com/profile/06915604908609700895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-85919055566267666052011-12-18T01:46:58.608-08:002011-12-18T01:46:58.608-08:00You just got two examples, there's a FAQ that ...You just got two examples, there's a FAQ that describes when what happens during a turn.<br /><br />It even (iirc) states that for something to happen in your opponent's turn, it has to be mentioned in the rules that it is something that can happen during your opponent's turn, not that it is something that cannot happen during your opponent's turn.<br /><br />Nowhere does it say that fleeing models have to roll during your opponent's turn, except for if they have to take a new morale test which they will automatically fail.<br /><br />Even then, if we assume your interpretation is correct, then the fleeing unit would still get to roll to regroup every movement phase instead of just your own, since, even if it doesn't contain the word subsequent, is worded the same way and means exactly the same.Quaadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06409060492234802808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-18926939926632051762011-12-17T21:56:46.123-08:002011-12-17T21:56:46.123-08:00I this the Dan I am thinking of because if it is t...I this the Dan I am thinking of because if it is then thats a biased oppinion. I clearly stated I only rules lawyer when two things happen, I am being dicked to and if the rule is clearly being misenterpretited. I was playing it that way since everyone in my main local group in RI plays it like that way I described. I was not mad in this case since I also explained if a rule is played in a certain way in a local area I tend to adapt. I could have forced a roll off and I did not....besides the TO couldn't give me any proof that I was wrong. Now if I am playing this wrong and a reader can point out a specific quote or FAQ that proves this just post it as I like to get corrected since I like to play the game rightKevinmcd28https://www.blogger.com/profile/06915604908609700895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-64956002016842166442011-12-17T16:40:18.617-08:002011-12-17T16:40:18.617-08:00Dude (Kevin), you are the one that is rules lawyer...Dude (Kevin), you are the one that is rules lawyering, and then complaining about it, and then posting only half the rule to back up your arguement:<br /><br />"units make a fall back move immediately upon failing a morale test. In each subsequent phase, they will make further fall back moves INSTEAD OF MOVING NORMALLY" emphasis mine.<br /><br />"Instead of" in GW's book means that yu have to sacrifice an action. Your opponent's models are not allowed to move in your movement phase normally, so they cannot make a normal fall back move.<br /><br />You said you tried to rules lawyer, and it failed, and that upset you because your opponent won the game. You tried to break the rules, and failed, and you got mad.<br /><br />Smells like WAAC spirit.Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04179305108630227191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-88220826386707783352011-12-17T16:37:14.882-08:002011-12-17T16:37:14.882-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04179305108630227191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-50811657847664451752011-12-17T12:45:18.469-08:002011-12-17T12:45:18.469-08:00Each consecutive movement phase has to specificall...Each consecutive movement phase has to specifically call out that it is also in the opponents turn as pr. the definition on how a turn works.<br />Especially since it's yourself who gets to decide when to roll for your fleeing unit so you can get something to stand in the way of it and thus reduce the distance it closes to the tableedge.<br /><br />Even in the WD battlerepports they only ever move fleeing units in the players own turn, unless something would cause the unit to roll morale in the opponents turn in which case they would have counted as failing it and will have to move again.<br />Even though I know that WD battlerepports sometimes does some wierd things, I very much doubt they would get something like that wrong for the entire duration of 5th edition.Quaadehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06409060492234802808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6515454463270943871.post-424823767751644182011-12-17T11:35:49.690-08:002011-12-17T11:35:49.690-08:00I don't know anybody who plays it the way you ...I don't know anybody who plays it the way you do. Everybody I know only runs in each of their own movement phases.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16777960761664489337noreply@blogger.com